[tweetmeme source=sparkandco only_single=false <a href=”https://www.URL.com”>https://www.URL.com</a>]
Now, with that disclaimer out of the way…
Tony has amassed quite a list of thought-provoking posts, which I could never hope to match. I do think one really critical aspect of brain-based learning that has struck me this year is not the cognitive side, but the executive function, that pre-frontal cortex stuff. The one that says: we feel before we think.
I repeat: we feel before we think.
For instructional designers (actually all designers), I think this is a very important consideration. How do we engage our audience emotionally in learning experiences? What emotions are we hoping to evoke? If we don’t consider this aspect, we miss a crucial part of the designing for the whole brain. I think (based on my mild obsession with Dan Pink’s A Whole New Mind) that what we really need to focus on is not so much the cognitive or cerebral stuff, but the emotional side.
I think one of the potential challenges many instructional designers face, especially e-learning, would be stepping out of the analytical shoes and getting in touch with their humanistic side or getting touchy-feely. Engage your audience in a story. Create a competitive challenge. Use humour. Use surprise. If you aren’t able to do that through the e-learning itself – figure out if you can blend in some kind of face-to-face or alternative element – podcasts or videos to introduce which provide the element of surprise, humour or mystery. I also wrote about this in a previous post.
I would say that not everything needs to be a story, so not to go O-T-T (over the top, one of my favorite Briticisms – my husband is a Brit). Building a performance support solution? Maybe doesn’t need to be a version of the History Detectives! Just don’t be one of those themey designers, where you try to make everything fit neatly into your theme.